Racism has been so misused that we may embrace racism, not any racism –'familyism'. Only those who know nothing may think that Zionism is racist. In any case, what is race?
Nevertheless David took the strong hold of Zion: the same is the city of David. (2 Sam 5:7)
Zion is a place. This seems well understood. It is Jerusalem. There is a dispute as to who possesses Jerusalem. Even Athiests have a stake in it. It's because they know it's where God put His Name. Yahweh Elohim, 'He who will be mighty ones'. His purpose- not 'now' – the future!
What fewer understand, as they put no effort to do so, is what Biblical Zionism means.
People shouldn't be ignorant – it's written on the UN!
It shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORD'S house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem. And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. (Isaiah 2:2-4)
OK. No more war. Peaceniks can wish and want it - but to be sure, did they put up a pro Ukraine sticker!? How can war be stopped? How can we make sure not one more kid dies in Africa or Asia or the Middle East or even Europe? Did the nations involved count and name the children killed in the Ukraine war?
So they think it's 'racist' to think there is one just law for all the world and one perfect worship, and no more war?
This is Jewish Zionism – global - united - oneness. Not racist. Good for all. Blessing for all.
There was never anything more seriously wrong with 'racism' of families and families as nations, except when people chose to kill whole families, due to their family history.
But in any case consider the complexity of truth, rather than the foolishness of simplicity?
Draw me if you please the line about the families of the earth to define race. You can't.
Whatever is 'white'? Is that race anyway? It's an accident of genes. One is pink, one ivory and another is tea brown and they have the same parents. Once Britain was divided into Normans and Saxons, and they were each different races. Was a Dane the same race as a Brit when they fought each other? Was a German the same race a Brit when they fought each other? Is a Ukrainian now a Russian? What is 'black' if Ethiopia is not Sudan and they might fight? And what is 'brown' if nearly everyone is brown - under the sun? What if a Dane now is genetically related to all about them but quarter African or Middle Eastern, yet by family and by nation a Dane? And if we are to ask of Jews, or course they are a family, and now about half are a nation. But in fact many have DNA in common with other families – some who are not of the Jewish family genetically have chosen Judaism and then become a member of the family. Not simple.
Then, despite wars, and some divisions into 'family-nations' and some nations that are not family, we are all one family from Adam and Eve. The Apostle Paul declares
And (God) hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; (Acts 17:26)
On investigation 'racism' vanishes as foolish simplicity – Yes, ‘racism’ might describe the absurd contortions of German NAZI official thinking to define a Jew… and even at that time the evil was the evil of killing those defined ‘people’ not the evil of the absurd definition of a people.
That is racism of itself as simplistic thinking is foolish - not evil.
No one is evil by being 'racist'- to favour, or to do good to one family over another. If so then advancing people based on their family origins over another another would be evil – but it Is routinely done. It's also called nepotism. It was done at my school based on Aboriginality. The favoured ones didn't do so well. Turns out tough love is better. Turns out being promoted for family rather than skill might ruin us. Foolish, but not evil.
But you are evil if you think family origins alone is a reason to kill or remove a person from their God-given home. If your nation starts a war, God can take your home, to the victors goes the power over land. If not, logically, Ukraine has no right to any land gained from the war from a Russian invasion, when clearly they do. How the world deals with the land Russia gains by beginning a hot war, will be up to them - but the winner always takes it all. Those who ask questions know the Ukraine war history began before today, as to who started what God knows, and any Russian victory is God’s judgement on what was done (Perfidious Albion admits to their role).
And then some say “palestinians” are a race – yes, they were in 1948 when Jews were called Palestinian and their enemy was pan-Arab and the Palestinian Jews of Hebron were massacred. And after 1948 every Jewish British-Mandate Palestinian was removed from the 'west bank' of the Jordan River by Jordan who occupied that area 19 years – and indeed Jordan brought in Arabs to replace Jews. But they were not then Palestinian.
Then if its racial ‘genocide’ you have to explain how it is that in the short since 1964 there are recently, and now despite a hot war, more Islamic Palestinians globally than Jewish Israelis – the most unsuccessful 'genocide' in all history - go ask AI – don't take my word for it.
So racism, assuming a definintion, alone isn't bad.
And Zionism isn't about one family, one 'race' even one nation – it's about world peace.
That's so well known it's written on the UN on the Isaiah wall in the Memorial garden and also shown in a scupture. The the UN sculpture here.
What do those screaming 'resistance' know of peace? Not in their hearts, so not in their family, and therefore not among their people. How is it that Jews might live with others ruling them and they never sought to tear down that system? If Jews could for centures live in Arab Islamic lands, and not commit 'resistance', why can't Islamic Arabs be ruled for a few years by Jews? No logic.
More – in fact all the world, in their secret heart of hearts, want this – if they could leave aside prejudice, envy and hatred - the desire of the nations.
For thus saith the LORD of hosts; Yet once, it is a little while, and I will shake the heavens, and the earth, and the sea, and the dry land; And I will shake all nations, and the desire of all nations shall come: and I will fill this house with glory, saith the LORD of hosts. (Hag 2:6-7)
And the LORD will create upon every dwelling place of mount Zion, and upon her assemblies, a cloud and smoke by day, and the shining of a flaming fire by night: for upon all the glory shall be a defence. And there shall be a tabernacle for a shadow in the daytime from the heat, and for a place of refuge, and for a covert from storm and from rain. (Isaiah 4:5-6)
